Republican voters are looking for the ultimate anti-Obama candidate. I don’t blaim them for wanting to vote against Obama. I don’t like Obama, he’s a teleprompter reading, big government globalist. But just like in 2008 when most Americans voted for “hope” and “change” because George Bush screwed the country so bad, in 2012 Americans are again hoping for change. Barack Obama screwed the country just as bad, if not worse than George W.

Barack Obama’s presidency has been so damaging to America. The tea party has been so successful at exposing Obama as a tool for Wall street and the corrupt bankers over at the Federal Reserve. But the problem with the tea party is their unhealthy trust for establishment republican politions. (Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Michelle Baucmen)

It looks like republican voters are throwing their support behind Newt Gingrich. Ron Paul, the only true constitutional conservative/libertarian in the race comes in second place in the a lot of polls. Rick Perry is out, Michelle Bacmen is out, Rick Santorum was never really in but he’s out. With Herman Cain dropping out to make money writing books about himself (“This Is Herman Cane”) and Flip flop Romney not winning over conservative voters, the only establishment crook left is Newt Gingrich.

• Newt is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations
• Newt supported a federal individual health-care mandate
• He supports and wants to continue the war on terror
• He supports the Patriot Act and other unconstitutional laws
• He’s against cutting military spending

 Gingrich is a RINO. Republican In Name Only. He talks like a conservative republican but acts and governs like a big government democrat.

The acronym RINO, emerging in the 90s, is a charge used in campaigns by Republican conservatives against party moderates.

 aka a FAKE CONSERVATIVE

Gingrich refers to himself as a “conservative futurist”. Webster’s (1992) Dictionary defines “Futurism” as: “Study of, and interest in, forecasting or anticipating the future, or theorizing on how to IMPOSE CONTROLS ON EVENTS.” (Emphasis added.)

Back in the 90′s he supported NAFTA, the precursor to a North American Union. He praised Clinton’s unconstitutional use of the U.S. military to inflict a communist regime on Haiti in 1994, the same year he voted for an extra $1.2 billion for United Nations “peacekeeping” missions. He also urged the President to expand U.S. military presence in Bosnia the following year. Gingrich congratulated Barack Obama for authorizing the assassination of anwar al-awlaki, the American born Yemeni Imam.

Newt also lobbied for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and took tax payer’s money from the bailouts they received from the government. Newt Gingrich is wrong for America. The United States has had too many bad Presidents in history, it’s about time American voters wake the hell up and stop voting these corrupt politicians into office.

Filed under: Elections Tagged: 2012 election newt gingrich republican debate ron paul ]]> http://puppetregime.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/newt-gingrich-a-wolf-in-a-conservative-suit/feed/ 0 puppetregime http://puppetregime.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/congrats-obama-youre-the-first-u-s-president-to-assassinate-an-american-citizen/ http://puppetregime.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/congrats-obama-youre-the-first-u-s-president-to-assassinate-an-american-citizen/#comments Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:56:48 +0000 puppetregime http://puppetregime.wordpress.com/?p=386 ]]> If the U.S. government calls you a terrorist, the president will send a hit team (aka predator drones) to come and kill you. The media is now cheering President Obama for authorizing the killing of an American born terrorist.

President Barack Obama is the first U.S. president to authorize the U.S. military to kill an American citizen. On September 30, 2011, U.S. predator drones killed anwar al-awlaki, a man the U.S. government claims was more dangerous that osama bin laden. The MSM propaganda is in high gear after the Obama-approved killing of the American born terrorist, with headlines like “How Anwar Al-Awlaki Inspired Terror From Across the Globe”(ABC), and “With al-Awlaki dead, al-Qaida lacks Western voice”(CBS). The telepromter readers on Fox News, CNN and MSNBC are all applauding the President.

The Republican presidential candidates are also waying in on it, some in support and some not. Romney, Perry, Bachman, and Gingrich all made statements congradulating the President. Ron Paul and Gary Johnson made statements critisizing the President. Paul and Johnson are the only candidates to point out the fact that the government can not just execute an American citizen without due process.

The Obama administrations hypocrisy has reached a whole another level. Obama, being the slick teleprompter reading con-artist that he is, stood up in front of the American people and made the claim that his order to kill the American born terrorist Anwar Al Awlaki was another victory in the decade long war on terror. He went on and on about how he is keeping America safe by killing terrorists while at the same time his administration arms al qaeda in Libya to overthrow the gaddafi government. The government and the media claim that Anwar Al Awlaki was connected to the 9/11 hiijackers. And that may be true, but what they won’t talk about is the dinner Anwar Al Awlaki attended at the pentagon months after 9/11.

It didnt take long for Barack Obama to show his true colors. An escalation in Afghanistan, a new war in Libya, and more big gov’t. Now that Barack Obama is on his way out, and unpopular as all hell, the controlled media is now telling you who the next leader will be. The next puppet. The next future war criminal. And that person is former Mass. governor Mitt Romney. He ran in 2008, but the establishment had a hard time selling a Republican to the American people after eight torturous years George Bush and Co.

After four years of Barack Obama, conservatives hate him so much, for the neocons now is the time to sell their criminal puppet to the people.

Is there a difference between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama? Not really.

Barack Obama is a democrat, and Mitt Romney is a republican. Thats about the only difference. And it’s annoying to even take the time to write this., but I’m sick of the American people being duped. The sick of well-meaning conservatives and liberals supporting establishment candidates. But thats who the media tells them to vote for. Alot of people still take what the media says as gospel. If Fox News says Mitt Romney is good, then mainline conservatives think he is and they will support him no matter what. Msnbc pundits says that Barack Obama is the best leader since FDR, so mainline liberals think he is and they support him no matter what. It really is a sad state of mind and way of thinking. It’s a herd mentality.

Ok, now to the point of this article. Is there really a differnce between Barack Hussein Obama and Willard Mitt Romney? They’re both big government creatures. In their personal lives, they’re probably completeley different. But when it comes to politics and government, they’re the same. Here’s a list of things BO and Willard agree on:

• Healthcare mandate
• Abortion should be safe and legal
• Global warming is real, and man is causing it
• Assault weapons ban
• Afghanistan war
• Arming Libyan rebels
• Gay rights
• No audit of the Federal Reserve
• Keep marijuana illegal
• Keep Gitmo open
• Sanctions on Iran
• Patriot Act

So there you go. Theres a few things Obama and Romney agree on. Like I said, they’re probably different in their personal lives. They probabaly like differnet movies, different music, and different NFL teams. But thats not what matters. And it doesnt matter how nice a person seems either. Barack Obama comes across as a friendly guy, but his presidency has been a nightmare. His political views are horrible. And if the the global elite put Romney in the White House, his presidency will be a nightmare as well.

—>Timeline of Norway’s twin attacks

MEDIA POINTS TO “RIGHT-WING EXTREMIST” AS LONE-GUNMAN

Who is man in custody in Norway carnage?

Norway awoke this morning to the greatest loss of life it has experienced since World War II.

Anders Behring Breivik: motives of a mass murderer

Norway police arrive 90 minutes after firing began

Norway Attacks Suspect Posted Right-Wing Rants

The laughing gunman

Why Would a “Right-Wing Nationalist” Massacre Young, Predominantly White Norwegians?

Uploaded by TruthSquadTV on Jul 23, 2011

LONE-WOLF or a CONSPIRACY?

Police not ruling out more suspects in Norway attacks

Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said Saturday afternoon that police were investigating many angles in the attacks, including the possibility of international support for the suspect.

‘Caution! Watch out for false flags’ RTUploaded by RussiaToday on Jul 23, 2011

These events are western governments turning their anti-terror apparatus inward

Norway Terror Attacks a False Flag by Webster G. Tarpley

Norway gunman claims a London connection and links to the EDL

During the Cold War, the neocons spent most of their time hyping the Soviet threat. They produced documentaries, publications, and provided guests for national talk shows and news reports, all designed to spread fear and encourage increases in defense spending. They even advacated a nuclear first strike against the Soviet Union.

As the Cold War was coming to an end, and the Soviet “threat” was deminishing, the neocons needed a new boogieman. In the late 80′s, Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein to sell him weapons.

The neocon think tank called Project for the New American Century (PNAC) wrote a “blueprint” for the “creation of a global Pax Americana”. The document, titled Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century lays out their plan for world domination.

The report calls itself a “blueprint for maintaining global US preeminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests.”

PNAC called for war in the middle east, control of space through a new “US Space Forces,” the political control of the internet, the subversion of any growth in political power of even close allies, and advocates “regime change” in China, North Korea, Libya, Syria, Iran and other countries. It also mentions that “advanced forms of biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool”

The neocons knew their imperial aggressive foreign policy would not sit well with the American people or the world. PNAC went on to say their agenda would take a long time “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.” On September 11, 2001, the neocons got what they wanted.

Former National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama, Zbigniew Brzezinski, said similar things in his book, “The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and It’s Geo-stragetic Imperatives”. Just like the neocons said in PNAC, Brzezinski calls for the US to become the world’s only superpower and invade the middle east for control of oil. Brzezinski concludes that the realization of such an agenda will only be accomplished with the aid of “a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat,”

Former governer of Pennsylvania and former Security of Homeland Security, Tom Ridge, claims that top-level Bush advisors told him to raise the terror alert level days before the 2004 presidential election. Isn’t that one of the definitions of terrorism, spreading fear and terrorizing people for political purposes?

In 2008, Vincent Bugliosi, who is best known for prosecuting Charles Manson, wrote a book entitled “The Prosecution Of George W. Bush for Murder”. The book argues that George W. Bush took the United States into the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses and should be tried for murder for the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq, as well as more than 100,000 Iraqis who have died in Iraq since the American-led invasion of that country. Bugliosi testified at a House Judiciary Committee meeting on July 25 2008, at which he urged impeachment proceedings for Bush.

After eight years of neocon policies, the American people demanded that Bush and Cheney be held accountable for their crimes. But when Congressman Dennis Kuninich introduced 30 articles of impeachment, of course the congress did nothing, letting W’s crimes fade away into history. Maybe its because the Democrats were just as guilty as Bush and Cheney when it came to the war. They voted to keep the war going. In 2008, Bush endorced John McCain for President, which was probley the reason he lost the election. During his campaign, McCain was saying stuff like he wanted to stay in Iraq for a hundred years, and bomb bomb Iran. Obama ran against Bush’s policies, so he won. But did the neocon policies leave with Bush and Cheney?

“Several of the individuals at the center of Obama’s transition and emerging foreign policy teams were top players in creating and implementing foreign policies that would pave the way for projects eventually carried out under the Bush/Cheney administration. With their assistance, Obama has already charted out several hawkish stances.” writes Jeremy Scahill, author of Blackwater, The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army

In 1999, Joe Biden cosponsored a resolution with John McCain and Joe Lieberman to use ground troops in Serbia, coinciding with the wishes of  PNAC. He also voted for the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Hillary Clinton also voted for the wars. In 2009, President Barack Obama escalated the war in Afghanistan. On August 31, 2010, President Obama announced he was ending the Iraq war, but leaving 50,000 troops in the country to provide support for the Iraqi military. It became Operation New Dawn, no longer Operation Iraqi freedom. That was the neocons plan for Iraq from the beginning. Barack Obama gave the neocons what they wanted. A permenant occupation of Iraq. Bush’s war on terror has also made its way to other parts of the Globe. Obama sends predator drones to Pakistan and Yemen almost daily to kill people and terrorize the population.

In part two, I’ll go over in more detail how Barack Obama continued the neocon agenda.

Supporters of President Obama will think he ended the war, but he will keep troops there permanently, this is what he said before becoming President…(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nJ78MVquFE&feature=search)

The fact is, we invaded Iraq for no good reason. The Bush regime lied about everything, and got away with it. The plan was to stay there forever. We have permanent military bases there, so we aint going anywhere. President Obama can lie and say he ended the war, but he didn’t. He’s leaving 50,000 troops there to occupy the country, and sending more private contractors there to reek havoc. Even if he brought ALL the troops home, he still sent more troops to Afghanistan and is bombing Pakistan with predator drones. The war crimes continue